<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Kukral is a Spammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/</link>
	<description>Affiliate Marketing Meets the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:37:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wee</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-58</guid>
		<description>@Sam&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is Messr Porter considered &#039;incent&#039;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam</p>
<p>Is Messr Porter considered &#39;incent&#39;?</p>
<p>Meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Nope, spamming your friends is still spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider this one permanent, tho. I&#039;m creating a &quot;Kukral Spam Filter&quot; in&lt;br&gt;Yahoo Pipes that will take out your sponsored tweets that I&#039;ll post up here&lt;br&gt;for all of your affected friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, spamming your friends is still spam.</p>
<p>Consider this one permanent, tho. I&#39;m creating a &#8220;Kukral Spam Filter&#8221; in<br />Yahoo Pipes that will take out your sponsored tweets that I&#39;ll post up here<br />for all of your affected friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Great points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I think a decent analogy can be made to email. If I give someone my email address, someone that I want to personally communicate with, not business-related, and that person then sends me a bunch of marketing messages... that&#039;s spam. That&#039;s not what I gave you my email address for. Same with Twitter. If I&#039;m following you, it&#039;s because I want to connect with you personally. I don&#039;t follow any accounts that are pure - or even mostly - advertising.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think another decent analogy can be made to conversations. If we&#039;re at an event and we&#039;re just talking, I don&#039;t want to hear about random business offers. To apply this concept to Jim, let&#039;s say I&#039;m talking to Jim at Summit. I want to hear about what he&#039;s doing in his life - him personally, and how his business is doing. What I don&#039;t expect is that Jim will pause the conversation mid-stream and give me a blatant, unrelated advertisement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s how I see Twitter. I know a certain amount of marketing comes into play - I have no qualms about using affiliate links when talking about a product on Twitter. I don&#039;t mind the occasional &quot;hey check this product out&quot; tweet. Sponsored Tweets, to my mind, cross a line - for me. This is how I use Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, in the end, I have no problem with these Sponsored Tweets because I don&#039;t think that Twitter should be limited to how *I* use it. Jim&#039;s got a point about just unfollowing people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Sam&#039;s got a point, too. We shouldn&#039;t have to completely unfollow someone. The fact that Twitter is all-or-nothing when it comes to incoming messages is a flaw in the system. It shouldn&#039;t be like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a decent analogy can be made to email. If I give someone my email address, someone that I want to personally communicate with, not business-related, and that person then sends me a bunch of marketing messages&#8230; that&#39;s spam. That&#39;s not what I gave you my email address for. Same with Twitter. If I&#39;m following you, it&#39;s because I want to connect with you personally. I don&#39;t follow any accounts that are pure &#8211; or even mostly &#8211; advertising.</p>
<p>I think another decent analogy can be made to conversations. If we&#39;re at an event and we&#39;re just talking, I don&#39;t want to hear about random business offers. To apply this concept to Jim, let&#39;s say I&#39;m talking to Jim at Summit. I want to hear about what he&#39;s doing in his life &#8211; him personally, and how his business is doing. What I don&#39;t expect is that Jim will pause the conversation mid-stream and give me a blatant, unrelated advertisement.</p>
<p>That&#39;s how I see Twitter. I know a certain amount of marketing comes into play &#8211; I have no qualms about using affiliate links when talking about a product on Twitter. I don&#39;t mind the occasional &#8220;hey check this product out&#8221; tweet. Sponsored Tweets, to my mind, cross a line &#8211; for me. This is how I use Twitter.</p>
<p>But, in the end, I have no problem with these Sponsored Tweets because I don&#39;t think that Twitter should be limited to how *I* use it. Jim&#39;s got a point about just unfollowing people.</p>
<p>But Sam&#39;s got a point, too. We shouldn&#39;t have to completely unfollow someone. The fact that Twitter is all-or-nothing when it comes to incoming messages is a flaw in the system. It shouldn&#39;t be like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-32</guid>
		<description>It is a great theme.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But no, I don&#039;t feel like I have to explain why (I think) SponsoredTweets is spam. That horse has been beaten way too many times by me and others. Ted and Jim are both great guys, but I have fundamental differences with them over how to use this stuff we&#039;re still developing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great theme.</p>
<p>But no, I don&#39;t feel like I have to explain why (I think) SponsoredTweets is spam. That horse has been beaten way too many times by me and others. Ted and Jim are both great guys, but I have fundamental differences with them over how to use this stuff we&#39;re still developing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Buechele</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Buechele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-31</guid>
		<description>My point is it appears you don&#039;t like it because you don&#039;t like it. And I&#039;m totally using this theme for my new blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is it appears you don&#39;t like it because you don&#39;t like it. And I&#39;m totally using this theme for my new blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-30</guid>
		<description>And your point is...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your point is&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Buechele</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Buechele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-29</guid>
		<description>You are writing a post about how Sponsored Tweets is spam right? Jim has more words in this post than you, and he&#039;s endorsing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are writing a post about how Sponsored Tweets is spam right? Jim has more words in this post than you, and he&#39;s endorsing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-28</guid>
		<description>No doubt there. Jim is the only decent person from Ohio that I know. Except for when he spams me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt there. Jim is the only decent person from Ohio that I know. Except for when he spams me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatehack.com/2009/08/03/jim-kukral-is-a-spammer/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>ted murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatehack.com/?p=73#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Jim is nothing but a fantastic guy. Your loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim is nothing but a fantastic guy. Your loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
